Does the page answer its title?
For a child care resource, checks include the explanation of licensing information, specific visit questions and a way to compare answers. A health or safety guide needs the main recommendation, its conditions and a clear source.
Are sources used accurately?
Source checks match the statement to the original material and retain the age, setting and other important conditions. A change to a source can affect a related tool, summary or printable version; those need review together.
Can the material be used?
An activity needs materials and steps. A worksheet needs understandable fields and enough space to write. A toolkit needs its actual components. A referral explanation needs a provider and responsibility for the next contact. These checks examine the material, not whether every family will choose it.
Is the path clear?
Website checks follow the path from a headline and summary to the full resource or download. They include reading order, tables and form labels on smaller screens, as well as whether a link delivers the described material.
What can reader feedback tell us?
A reported error or confusing explanation can identify a problem requiring review. A positive comment can describe one reader's experience. Neither alone establishes an educational or health outcome for a population.
Describe results at the right level
The current library contains 48 guides and 16 tools. These are publication counts, not counts of families served or evidence that a child's health improved.